Skip navigation

Greetings Bearers!

As somebody who is deeply in love with the games Ico and Shadow of the Colossus (with the latter being part of the inspiration for the Vein series), I thought it fitting to put together a sketched theory of how the two games are linked (If you know anything about the games, you know what I’m talking about. If not, I strongly recommend checking these games out. Quite fun and rewarding!).

Anyway, the theory document is attached in PDF to this entry. Look below and Enjoy!

See you in the Vein!
J. Dean

SotC theories

Greetings, Bearers!

Yes, July came and went without any post from me (though without any lost fingers due to firework accidents), and while I do regret that sincerely, I am happy to say that I have now completed writing my fifth novel in the Vein series, and am well on my way to getting the fourth one completed as far as editing goes, and the third installation in my Surrealities series is on its way to being published.

My intended timetable for putting out the fourth Vein novel and the third Surrealities installment is early September, and God willing it’ll be a timetable that goes without interruption (pause for skeptical laugh). The writing has been progressing well, and those of you who have been patiently waiting will soon be rewarded for your anticipation.

In the meantime, summer is in swing for (officially) another month and a half: make sure you get out there and enjoy it. Except for you bums in states like California and Florida, who complain when the weather gets below sixty-five and put on fleeces and jackets (HA! We’re all in tank tops and bare feet in such weather in Michigan, and if you’d like to swap places with me for say, thirty years or so, I’d be happy to trade!)

Before I sign off, I want to extend a hearty welcome and thanks to first-time purchasers of my works! I hope you’re enjoying them and telling others about them! Feel free to drop me a line if you have any questions! I’ll get back to you soon! Promise.

See you all in the Vein, and soon!

J. Dean

Greetings, Bearers!

While in the middle of drowning myself in a great many writing projects (yes, but it’s a GOOD drowning… :D ), I wanted to throw out to you guys a reminder that I’m going to be appearing at the RadCon in Washington state next February. As this is my first convention appearance, I’m looking forward to this with bated breath!

If you’re a fan who plans to attend RadCon and would like to introduce yourself, please feel free to come on out and say hi! I’d love to meet you! So come on out and get your selfie taken with me (hopefully my face won’t break your smartphone :) ).

Okay, back to writing. I’ve got a great many things on my plate, and I’m loving them all. It’s official: I’m a writeaholic… if there is such a thing.

See you in the Vein!

J. Dean

Greetings, Bearers!

No, I’ve not died, I’ve not retired, and I’ve certainly not been abducted by aliens (although the government comes darn close to earning that one). I’ve been busy writing, editing, and finishing up the school year. I’ll be back soon with some more stuff, hopefully before the end of the month (Of course, this depends upon whether or not my wonderful daughter decides to give me back my laptop, which has the next pair of stories for Surrealities 3 almost ready).

So don’t worry, I’m still here. Make sure you check out my work if you’ve not already done so. If you have, I give you a big thank you and hope you’re enjoying it. Tell others about it if you liked it.

Okay, back to business. Don’t wait up too late for me!

See you in the Vein!
J. Dean

Avengers: Age of Ultron

Go see it

:D

Enough said!

J. Dean

(I’m sure that somehow this is a Haiku gone bad)

Greetings, Bearers!

Okay, so a week turned into a month. My apologies for not writing back sooner. That’s what happens when a typically focused person makes the mistake of trying to multitask :D

So getting back to my point in my previous post: Magic in writing. In light of what I put down last time about the inconsistencies and interior logic problems that arise when magic is not thoughtfully and carefully incorporated in novels, I wanted to do in this second part is give some advice to those of you who are brave enough to tackle the topic in your books. So, if you’re interested in this, read on!

1.) Establish rules and boundaries for your magic. Understand that if you decide to make magic limitless in its potential, you’re opening doors for inconsistencies in logic. As I alluded to in the previous post, if you have a character who can cast a spell and reduce a castle wall to rubble, then you’d better be prepared to explain why that same character cannot use that magic should (s)he be locked up in a dungeon and be unable to escape.

2.) Along those same lines, beware the temptation to make magic the answer for everything. If a character can simply resolve a situation with a wave of the wand, the story loses its tension. Part of the appeal of storytelling is placing the characters in a position which requires some sort of risk or fear that must be confronted when dealing with the problem at hand: be it an impersonal or personal one. The idea of a magical resolution can seem cool in the mind of the author, but in the mind of the reader it can end up being a letdown because it turned out to be nothing more than an “abracadabra” solution that is utilized instead of a real nail-biting scene.

3.) As with every other cool concept in fantasy, magic is no substitute for good character development and good story. Remember that the special effects we authors contrive in our heads, as awesome as we think they may be, are at best enhancements to the story. If we fall into the trap of “George Lucas syndrome” (where the special effects overshadow the story or become an attempt to mask weak character or plot development) then we’ve not only wasted our concept, but we’ve also wasted our story as well.

Take these suggestions for what they’re worth. Trial and error, both in my own personal writing and in reading the works of others, has taught me a great deal about such things. May they be as valuable to you in your craft.

Okay, back to my own stories now. Keep up the good writing, my friends!

See you in the Vein!
J. Dean

Greetings, Bearers!
A busy couple of weeks have passed, and while I’ve been careful to keep writing (including starting on another new story for the Surrealities series), it’s been a bit difficult to find a chance to re-connect with you on the blog site. Fortunately, there’s always something that comes across my short little span of attention which triggers the writing bug with me, especially if it’s something about writing. :D
Yesterday, while watching this CinemaSins critique of Harry Potter, Jeremy (yes, the CinemaSins guy’s name is also Jeremy… probably why I like watching his stuff ;) ) pointed out something that I have been critical about numerous times but (to my recollection) have not taken the time to sit down and actually write about: namely, the consistent usage of magic in fiction.
Now, I need to make a full disclosure here: for those of you who do not know this, I am a Christian. And when I say Christian, I mean a full-blown, historically confessional, catholic (not Roman Catholic, but catholic in the traditional sense of the word) Christian, not simply somebody who shows up for Christmas, Easter, and nothing else. And while I do not hit people over the head with Christianity every chance I get, I don’t hide it, either. I do take it very seriously, because it’s true.
I say that to say this: whenever I talk about this subject, there are people who mistake my disdain for the use of magic in writing for a carte blanche accusation of Satanism for all things magical in books and movies. Of course, this is not the case. I love Tolkien, and there is magic in Tolkien. I love Star Wars, and it’s just as apt to call The Force a kind of magic (yes, even despite the midichlorians) as anything else. So aside from the promotion of blatant occult practice (such as Ouija boards), I don’t have a problem with the idea of magic introduced in fiction as a natural part of that world.
My issue as a writer comes from this: that magic, if not carefully explained and defined, can become a major point of inconsistency within the storyline.
I have seen this more often than I’d like to remember, and you probably have as well. A character will have magical ability, and will do something as incredible as, say, obliterate a dragon with a single wave of the hand or an uttered spell. But later on, that same character will be confronted with a much lesser enemy (a human opponent, for instance) who also needs to be eliminated, but suddenly cannot use their magical ability for reasons not explained to the reader or audience. Yet, instead of suspending disbelief, the thoughtful reader stops and asks “Why?” And since the explanation is not given (or is given in a cryptic, unsatisfying manner, like when the character in question suddenly turns to the mortal with him and says “You need to do this on your own.”), the story’s sense of interior logic is upset. In the end, the author has unintentionally pulled the rug out from under his own credibility, and the world he or she has created has fallen apart.
It’s the Gilligan’s Island theory of consistency. In the television show, Gilligan’s Island, the castaways had a professor among their numbers who could build a battery charger out of coconuts, among other things, but for some reason had trouble constructing a raft. No real consistency is given as to why the Professor can or cannot put together some devices, and the viewer is left befuddled with the lack of order and logic. Of course, I realize that Gilligan’s Island was a comedic series which was never intended to be a show which required a great deal of intellectual discipline to watch, but nevertheless the inability for the show to put together sensible situations did leave it with a lack of credibility that is best left for humor which requires no such continuity.
On the other hand, a work of fiction which constructs a world governed by laws of nature differing from our own still requires consistency if it is to be taken seriously. If magic works in one situation but not another, it is up to the author to explain why this comes to pass, and do so with a plausible explanation. This is especially important when the author is coming to a climactic conflict of a plot and realizes that a particular character’s magical powers should be able to make short work of a conflict, thus making the climactic conflict not so climactic. Real thought and definition must be put into a work that draws on magic, precisely because there is just as much room for blatant inconsistency as there is for wondrous imagination.
And if you’re an author who wants to hear from your audience (like I do), you’d rather hear “Wow! Great story!” rather than “How is it that the antagonist could kill an entire army with a magic curse uttered halfway across the continent, but not do the same thing while standing in the same room as the hero?”
Food for thought this week. Digest it, and I’ll be back next week with part two. :D
See you in the Vein!
J. Dean

Greetings, Bearers,

Unfortunately, I come on a somewhat sad note this day. Actor Leonard Nimoy, famous for his portrayal of the original Mr. Spock of Star Trek fame, died today. He was 83.

If you’re into any sort of good science fiction at all, chances are you have Star Trek to thank for this. It was one of the greatest sf shows in existence, and I still run to Gene Roddenberry’s masterpiece as a source of inspiration and influence. A great deal of the charm and attraction came from the emotionless Mr. Spock, played masterfully by Nimoy, who himself had a significant degree of contribution to the character. He was, indeed, a character who, although he had no emotion, nevertheless had great depth as a character.

He will be greatly missed. He was–IS–Mr. Spock.

See you in the Vein,
J.Dean

Greetings, Bearers!

Before I get back to business, I wanted to bring up a great quote from Ernest Hemingway about the craft of writing. Thanks goes out to Pastor Brian Thomas for posting this on his blog:

If a writer of prose knows enough about what he is writing about he may omit things that he knows and the reader, if the writer is writing truly enough, will have a feeling of those things as strongly as though the writer had stated them. The dignity of movement of an iceberg is due to only one-eighth of it being above water. A writer who omits things because he does not know them only makes hollow places in his writing. A writer who appreciates the seriousness of writing so little that he is anxious to make people see he is formally educated, cultured or well-bred is merely a popinjay

Learn it, and remember it. Hemingway (who is not my favorite author, but a prime example of excellent prose nonetheless) speaks the truth.

Okay, back to it. DIVE! DIVE!

See you in the Vein!
J. Dean

Greetings, Bearers (and others)!

On a little side note for those who are theologically inclined, I’ve just published a review of Michael Horton’s book Ordinary over on Amazon.com. If you’d like to read my thoughts about the book (which were overwhelmingly positive) check it out HERE

Okay, back to mischief (and writing too, but that’s been hard to come by this week. Next week I get back on the ball. Promise :D )

See you in the Vein!
J. Dean

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 27 other followers